POPStudying

Cambridge 0580 IGCSE  ·  Topic E1.17

E1.17 Exponential Growth and Decay

Image  ·  914 × 270

01 — Explanation

What makes a change "exponential" rather than linear?

A linear change adds or removes the same fixed amount every period. An exponential change instead applies the same fixed percentage of the current value every period — so the actual amount added or removed keeps changing as the value itself changes. Populations, investments, radioactive substances, and depreciating vehicles all typically behave this way.

02 — Explanation

What is the general formula for exponential growth and decay?

N=N0(1±r100)tN = N_0\left(1 \pm \frac{r}{100}\right)^t

where N0N_0 is the initial value, r%r\% is the rate per time period, tt is the number of periods, ++ is used for growth and −- for decay.

GrowthDecay
Multiplier1+r100>11+\dfrac{r}{100} > 11−r100<11-\dfrac{r}{100} < 1
Typical usePopulation, investment growthDepreciation, radioactive decay

Examiner Tip: "Depreciates" or "decays" always means subtract the rate from 11; "grows" or "increases" always means add it — check the wording before picking your multiplier.

03 — Explanation

How do I apply the formula to a depreciation or population problem?

Identify N0N_0, rr, and tt, substitute into the formula, and evaluate the power before multiplying by N0N_0.

Worked Example

A machine is bought for \18\,000.Itdepreciatesexponentiallyat. It depreciates exponentially at12\%peryear.Finditsvalueafterper year. Find its value after6$ years, correct to the nearest dollar.

  1. Decay multiplier: 1−12100=0.881-\dfrac{12}{100}=0.88.
  2. Apply the formula: N=18 000×(0.88)6N = 18\,000 \times (0.88)^6.
  3. Evaluate: (0.88)6=0.4644…(0.88)^6 = 0.4644\ldots, so N=18 000×0.4644…=8359.4…N = 18\,000\times0.4644\ldots = 8359.4\ldots
  4. Round: N \approx \8359$.

Examiner Tip: Don't multiply 12%×6=72%12\%\times6=72\% and subtract that in one go — each year's decrease applies to the already-reduced value, which is exactly why the formula needs a power, not a single multiplication.

04 — Explanation

How does the same formula work for a growth problem, like a growing population?

Nothing changes except the multiplier — use 1+r1001+\dfrac{r}{100} instead of 1−r1001-\dfrac{r}{100}, since the quantity is increasing by a fixed percentage of itself each period rather than decreasing.

Worked Example

A bacteria population starts at 20002000 and grows exponentially at a rate of 8%8\% per hour. Find the population after 55 hours, correct to the nearest whole number.

  1. Growth multiplier: 1+8100=1.081+\dfrac{8}{100}=1.08.
  2. Apply the formula: N=2000×(1.08)5N = 2000\times(1.08)^5.
  3. Evaluate: (1.08)5=1.46932…(1.08)^5 = 1.46932\ldots, so N=2000×1.46932…=2938.6…N = 2000\times1.46932\ldots = 2938.6\ldots
  4. Round to a whole number of bacteria: N≈2939N\approx2939.

05 — Explanation

How do I find the rate or the number of time periods, if those are the unknowns instead?

If tt is unknown, you would need logarithms to solve directly — not required at this level, so such problems are normally restricted to finding N0N_0, rr, or NN given the other quantities, or to comparing two given scenarios (e.g. "after how many whole years does the value first drop below \X?")bysubstitutingincreasingwhole−numbervaluesof?") by substituting increasing whole-number values oft$ and checking.

Examiner Tip: For a "first drops below" style question, test consecutive integer values of tt in the formula rather than trying to rearrange for tt algebraically — this syllabus does not require logarithms.