01 — Explanation
How do I find the upper and lower bound of a rounded measurement?
Any measurement rounded to the nearest unit could actually be anywhere within half a unit either side of the stated value:
For example, a length of measured to the nearest has and .
02 — Explanation
How do I find the bound of a sum or difference of two measurements?
| Operation | To maximise the result | To minimise the result |
|---|---|---|
Subtraction is the one that catches people out: to make as large as possible, you want big and small — so it's , not .
03 — Explanation
How do I find the bound of a product or quotient of two measurements?
| Operation | To maximise the result | To minimise the result |
|---|---|---|
The underlying pattern: to make a fraction as large as possible, maximise the top and minimise the bottom, and vice versa.
04 — Explanation
Which bounds do I use to maximise or minimise a calculated quantity like speed?
Identify the formula, then apply the product/quotient rule above term by term.
Worked Example
A distance of is measured correct to the nearest , and a time of is measured correct to the nearest second. Find the upper bound of the average speed, in m/s.
- Bounds for : , .
- Bounds for (half-unit ): , .
- Speed ; to maximise it, divide the largest possible distance by the smallest possible time:
Examiner Tip: It's tempting to pair "upper bound of speed" with "upper bound of time" — but a smaller denominator makes a fraction bigger, so maximising a quotient always means minimising the bottom. Keep exact bound values through the whole calculation and round only the final answer.
05 — Explanation
Why do we sometimes write bounds with a strict inequality on one side?
Strictly speaking, a measurement rounded to the nearest unit can equal its lower bound exactly, but can never reach its upper bound — a value of exactly would itself round to , not . This is why a fully rigorous bound is written as . At this level you are not expected to justify this asymmetry in every answer, but you should recognise the notation if it appears in a question, and never write .
06 — Explanation
How do I find the bound of a quantity involving more than two measurements, like a formula with three variables?
Apply the same maximise/minimise logic to each variable in turn, based on whether it appears as a numerator-type or denominator-type quantity in the formula.
Worked Example
The volume of a cuboid is , where , , and , each measured correct to the nearest centimetre. Find the lower bound of the volume.
- Every variable is multiplied (numerator-type), so minimising means minimising all three at once.
- Bounds: , , .
- Multiply: .