01 — Explanation
What makes a change "exponential" rather than linear?
A linear change adds or removes the same fixed amount every period. An exponential change instead applies the same fixed percentage of the current value every period — so the actual amount added or removed keeps changing as the value itself changes. Populations, investments, radioactive substances, and depreciating vehicles all typically behave this way.
02 — Explanation
What is the general formula for exponential growth and decay?
where is the initial value, is the rate per time period, is the number of periods, is used for growth and for decay.
| Growth | Decay | |
|---|---|---|
| Multiplier | ||
| Typical use | Population, investment growth | Depreciation, radioactive decay |
Examiner Tip: "Depreciates" or "decays" always means subtract the rate from ; "grows" or "increases" always means add it — check the wording before picking your multiplier.
03 — Explanation
How do I apply the formula to a depreciation or population problem?
Identify , , and , substitute into the formula, and evaluate the power before multiplying by .
Worked Example
A machine is bought for \18\,00012\%6$ years, correct to the nearest dollar.
- Decay multiplier: .
- Apply the formula: .
- Evaluate: , so
- Round: N \approx \8359$.
Examiner Tip: Don't multiply and subtract that in one go — each year's decrease applies to the already-reduced value, which is exactly why the formula needs a power, not a single multiplication.
04 — Explanation
How does the same formula work for a growth problem, like a growing population?
Nothing changes except the multiplier — use instead of , since the quantity is increasing by a fixed percentage of itself each period rather than decreasing.
Worked Example
A bacteria population starts at and grows exponentially at a rate of per hour. Find the population after hours, correct to the nearest whole number.
- Growth multiplier: .
- Apply the formula: .
- Evaluate: , so
- Round to a whole number of bacteria: .
05 — Explanation
How do I find the rate or the number of time periods, if those are the unknowns instead?
If is unknown, you would need logarithms to solve directly — not required at this level, so such problems are normally restricted to finding , , or given the other quantities, or to comparing two given scenarios (e.g. "after how many whole years does the value first drop below \Xt$ and checking.
Examiner Tip: For a "first drops below" style question, test consecutive integer values of in the formula rather than trying to rearrange for algebraically — this syllabus does not require logarithms.