POPStudying

Cambridge 0580 IGCSE  ·  Topic E6.6

E6.6 Pythagoras' Theorem and Trigonometry in 3D

Image  ·  914 × 270

01 — Explanation

How do I find a length hidden inside a 3D solid?

Pythagoras and SOHCAHTOA still work in three dimensions — the real skill is spotting the flat right-angled triangle buried inside the solid. Almost every 3D problem is solved by working through two right-angled triangles in sequence: a base triangle first, then a vertical triangle that reuses that result.

02 — Explanation

How do I find the space diagonal of a cuboid?

For a cuboid with length ll, width ww, height hh: first find the diagonal across the base, then combine it with the height.

d=l2+w2D=d2+h2d = \sqrt{l^2+w^2} \qquad D = \sqrt{d^2+h^2}

For l=8l=8, w=6w=6, h=5h=5 cm:

d=82+62=100=10 cmD=102+52=125=11.2 cm (3 s.f.)d = \sqrt{8^2+6^2}=\sqrt{100}=10 \text{ cm} \qquad D=\sqrt{10^2+5^2}=\sqrt{125}=11.2 \text{ cm } (3\text{ s.f.})

Examiner Tip

Never substitute a single edge where a diagonal is needed — the angle between a space diagonal and the base always uses the base diagonal, not one wall of the cuboid, as the adjacent side.

03 — Explanation

How do I find the angle between a diagonal and the base?

Using the same cuboid, the triangle formed by the height, the base diagonal, and the space diagonal (hypotenuse) gives:

tan⁡θ=heightbase diagonal=510=0.5  ⟹  θ=tan⁡−1(0.5)=26.6° (1 d.p.)\tan\theta = \frac{\text{height}}{\text{base diagonal}} = \frac{5}{10} = 0.5 \implies \theta = \tan^{-1}(0.5) = 26.6° \ (1\text{ d.p.})

04 — Explanation

How is the angle between a diagonal and a face different from the angle with the base?

The base is only one of six faces — a diagonal can also be compared with a side face. The working triangle changes accordingly: instead of using the base diagonal, it uses one full edge of the cuboid as the "adjacent" side, since that edge lies within the face being compared.

Example: using the same cuboid (l=8l=8, w=6w=6, h=5h=5), find the angle between the space diagonal and the face measuring 8×58\times5.

The diagonal of that face is 82+52=89\sqrt{8^2+5^2}=\sqrt{89}, but the angle with the face is found using the edge perpendicular to that face (w=6w=6) as the opposite side and the face's own diagonal as the adjacent side:

sin⁡θ=6D=611.2  ⟹  θ=sin⁡−1(0.53554...)=32.4° (1 d.p.)\sin\theta = \frac{6}{D} = \frac{6}{11.2} \implies \theta = \sin^{-1}(0.53554...) = 32.4° \ (1\text{ d.p.})

Always identify which face or line a question refers to before drawing the triangle — "the base" and "a side face" give genuinely different right-angled triangles, not just different numbers in the same one.

05 — Explanation

How does this apply to a pyramid?

A square-based pyramid ABCDABCD with vertex VV directly above the centre MM, side 1010 cm, height VM=12VM=12 cm — find the angle between edge VAVA and the base.

  1. Diagonal of the base: AC=102+102=200AC = \sqrt{10^2+10^2}=\sqrt{200} cm.
  2. MM is the midpoint of that diagonal: AM=2002=50AM = \dfrac{\sqrt{200}}{2}=\sqrt{50} cm.
  3. In right triangle VMAVMA, the required angle is at AA:
tan⁡θ=VMAM=1250  ⟹  θ=tan⁡−1(1.69706...)=59.5° (1 d.p.)\tan\theta = \frac{VM}{AM} = \frac{12}{\sqrt{50}} \implies \theta = \tan^{-1}(1.69706...) = 59.5° \ (1\text{ d.p.})

Carry 50\sqrt{50} through unrounded rather than converting it to a decimal early — rounding an intermediate length before the final trig step is the most common source of an inaccurate answer here.

06 — Explanation

How do I find the angle between two slant edges of a pyramid?

Using the same pyramid, the angle ∠VAC\angle VAC between edge VAVA and the base diagonal ACAC can be found once VAVA itself is known, since triangle VMAVMA is right-angled at MM:

VA=VM2+AM2=122+(50)2=144+50=194=13.93 cmVA = \sqrt{VM^2+AM^2} = \sqrt{12^2+(\sqrt{50})^2} = \sqrt{144+50} = \sqrt{194} = 13.93 \text{ cm}

The angle between two edges that meet at a vertex (like VAVA and VCVC) instead requires the isosceles triangle VACVAC, using AC=200AC=\sqrt{200} as its base and the now-known VA=VC=194VA=VC=\sqrt{194} as its equal sides — splitting that isosceles triangle down its line of symmetry converts it into two more right-angled triangles, exactly as in a 2D isosceles problem.