01 — Explanation
How is solving an inequality different from solving an equation?
Almost identical algebra — add, subtract, multiply, divide to isolate — with one critical exception: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number flips the direction of the inequality sign. Never replace the inequality symbol with "=" partway through your working; that misrepresents the whole answer as a single value instead of a range.
Example: . Dividing both sides by gives — notice became .
Exam Tip
You can dodge the sign-flip rule entirely by always collecting the -terms on whichever side keeps the coefficient positive. For , subtract (not ) from both sides to get , avoiding division by a negative altogether.
02 — Explanation
How do I solve a multi-step inequality with brackets?
Expand first, then gather terms exactly as you would for an equation:
03 — Explanation
How do I solve a compound inequality like -7 \le 2x+1 < 9?
Apply the same operation to all three parts simultaneously:
If dividing by a negative number were needed, both signs in the compound inequality would flip at once.
04 — Explanation
How do I draw the solution on a number line?
- Open circle (○): strict inequality ( or ) — the boundary value itself is not included.
- Closed/filled circle (●): inclusive inequality ( or ) — the boundary value is included.
- An arrow extends from the circle in the direction of all the valid values (right for "greater than," left for "less than").
For the compound solution : a filled circle at , an open circle at , joined by a solid line between them.
05 — Explanation
How do I list the integer solutions of an inequality?
Convert the continuous range into a discrete list by carefully checking each boundary against strict vs. inclusive:
Example: . The lowest integer is (included), and since must be strictly less than , the highest integer is . Solutions: .
Exam Tip
The most common error here is forgetting that is an integer — don't skip it just because the list crosses from negative to positive values. The second most common error is including a strict boundary by mistake (e.g. listing as a solution of , when the smallest valid integer is actually ).
06 — Explanation
How do I form an inequality from a word problem?
Define the variable, translate the constraint directly (e.g. "no more than" becomes ), solve, and sanity-check the answer makes physical sense (a length or cost can't be negative).
07 — Worked example
Worked example
Solve . State the smallest integer value of that satisfies the inequality.
- Add to both sides: .
- Add 5 to both sides: .
- Divide by 5 (positive, so the sign is unchanged): .
- Since is strictly greater than 4, the smallest integer solution is .