POPStudying

Pearson Edexcel 4MA1 IGCSE  ·  Topic G7.14  ·  Higher tier

G7.14 Congruent Triangles

Image  ·  914 × 270

01 — Explanation

What does "congruent" actually mean, and how is it different from "similar"?

Congruent shapes are identical in shape and size — one maps exactly onto the other via reflection, rotation, or translation (never an enlargement, since that changes size). Similar shapes share the same shape but can differ in size, with sides in a constant ratio rather than equal. Congruence is really the special case of similarity where the scale factor is exactly 11.

02 — Explanation

What are the four valid conditions for proving two triangles congruent?

ConditionRequirement
SSSAll three sides match.
SASTwo sides and the included angle (the angle between them) match.
ASATwo angles and the included side match.
AASTwo angles and any side match (the third angle is automatically fixed by the angle sum, converting this to ASA).
RHSRight angle, hypotenuse, and one other side match (right triangles only).

03 — Explanation

Why don't AAA and SSA prove congruence?

AAA only fixes the shape, not the size — the triangle can be "zoomed" to any scale while keeping every angle the same, so it proves similarity, not congruence.

SSA doesn't fix a unique triangle either: the non-included side can "swing" to meet the base at two different points, producing two genuinely different triangles that both satisfy the same SSA data (the same ambiguity behind the sine rule's ambiguous case).

Exam Tip: RHS looks like SSA at first glance (angle, side, side) — but it's valid because Pythagoras lets you calculate the third side uniquely from the other two, which escalates it to SSS. That's the one exception.

04 — Explanation

How do I structure a full congruence proof to get all the marks?

State three matching pairs, each with its own justification, then conclude with the named condition:

  1. Statement 1 + reason (e.g. "Given", "common side", "vertically opposite angles are equal").
  2. Statement 2 + reason.
  3. Statement 3 + reason.
  4. Conclusion: "Therefore △…≅△…\triangle\ldots\cong\triangle\ldots by [SSS/SAS/ASA/AAS/RHS]."

Exam Tip: A fact with no reason attached (e.g. just writing "AB=CDAB=CD") scores nothing — every statement needs its justification, and the final mark is for correctly naming the condition.

05 — Explanation

What do I do once I've proven two triangles are congruent?

Use CPCTC — Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent — to deduce any other equal side or angle you actually need. This is usually the real point of the question; the congruence proof is a stepping stone, not the final answer.

06 — Worked example

Worked exam-style question

ABCABC is equilateral. DD lies on BCBC with AD⊥BCAD\perp BC. (a) Prove △ADB≅△ADC\triangle ADB\cong\triangle ADC. (b) Hence prove BD=DCBD=DC.

(a)

  1. ∠ADB=∠ADC=90°\angle ADB=\angle ADC=90° — given, AD⊥BCAD\perp BC.
  2. AB=ACAB=AC — sides of an equilateral triangle are equal.
  3. ADAD is common to both triangles.
  4. Conclusion: △ADB≅△ADC\triangle ADB\cong\triangle ADC by RHS (right angle, hypotenuse AB=ACAB=AC, common side ADAD).

Exam Tip: Never use the thing you're asked to prove as a reason earlier in the proof — in part (a), you cannot assume BD=DCBD=DC, since that's exactly what part (b) asks you to establish from the congruence.

(b) Since the triangles are congruent, CPCTC gives BD=DCBD=DC directly (corresponding sides opposite the equal angles ∠BAD\angle BAD and ∠CAD\angle CAD).

07 — Explanation

How do I prove a property of a quadrilateral using congruent triangles?

Split it with a diagonal into two triangles, prove those triangles congruent, then use CPCTC.

Worked example: Prove opposite sides of a parallelogram ABCDABCD are equal. Draw diagonal ACAC.

  1. ∠BAC=∠DCA\angle BAC=\angle DCA (alternate angles, AB∥DCAB\parallel DC).
  2. ACAC is common.
  3. ∠BCA=∠DAC\angle BCA=\angle DAC (alternate angles, AD∥BCAD\parallel BC).
  4. △ABC≅△CDA\triangle ABC\cong\triangle CDA by ASA, so by CPCTC, AB=CDAB=CD and AD=BCAD=BC.

08 — Common mistakes

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Quoting "SAS" when the angle you found isn't actually the included one.
  • Using AAA (equal angles only) as if it proved congruence.
  • Writing a fact without its justification.
  • Circular reasoning — using the conclusion of a later part as a premise in an earlier one.