01 — Explanation
Why can't I just use the unitary method here?
The unitary method (find one, scale up) breaks down once a relationship involves a square, cube, or root rather than a straight multiple — e.g. " is proportional to the cube of " can't be solved by simple scaling. Higher Tier proportion questions are built specifically around these non-linear relationships, so you need one universal algebraic method that works for all of them.
02 — Explanation
How do I convert "proportional to" into a solvable equation?
Replace the symbol with "" (direct) or "" (inverse), where is the constant of proportionality:
03 — Explanation
What's the 4-step method for any proportion question?
- Write the statement: translate the wording exactly, e.g. " is inversely proportional to the square of " → .
- Form the equation: .
- Find : substitute the one given pair of values and solve.
- Write the final formula and solve: substitute back in, then use the formula for whatever the question actually asks.
Worked example: ; when . Find when .
, so . When : .
Exam Tip: Write out all 4 steps explicitly on your answer line — "forgetting the power" (writing instead of ) is the single most common mark loss, and showing Step 1 forces you to commit to the correct power before substituting numbers.
04 — Explanation
How do the six relationships and their graphs compare?
| Relationship | Equation | Graph shape |
|---|---|---|
| straight line through origin | ||
| reciprocal curve | ||
| parabola through origin | ||
| steep reciprocal, symmetric about -axis | ||
| cubic through origin | ||
| "sideways parabola" from origin |
05 — Explanation
How do I solve a combined proportion problem?
Combined problems link two separate proportion statements through a shared variable — solve each with the 4-step method, then substitute one formula into the other.
Worked exam-style question: , and . Given when , and when , find in terms of .
- , so .
- , so .
- Substitute : .
06 — Explanation
How do I recognise direct vs inverse in a worded context?
Ask: if one quantity increases, does the other increase too (direct) or decrease (inverse)? More cleaners means less time to finish a job — that's inverse, so : cleaners taking hours gives "cleaner-hours", so cleaners would take hours.
07 — Common mistakes
Common mistakes to avoid
- Writing when the question says "square", "cube", or "square root" — always write the proportionality statement first.
- Confusing direct and inverse — do the "increase/decrease" context check before setting up the equation.
- Solving for the wrong variable at the end — re-read exactly what value the question wants once you have the formula.
- Mixing inconsistent units (e.g. km/h with minutes) before substituting.