01 — Explanation
Why can't I just solve a quadratic inequality like an equation?
Solving gives two discrete points. The inequality asks a different question entirely: for which infinite range of -values is this true? A common and costly error is changing the inequality sign to "=" and treating the critical values as the whole answer — they're only the boundaries of the answer.
02 — Explanation
What's the reliable 4-step method?
Step 1 — Standard form with : Rearrange so one side is 0, and multiply by if needed to make the coefficient positive (remember: multiplying/dividing by a negative flips the inequality sign). This guarantees you'll always be sketching a U-shape, removing one whole layer of decision-making.
Step 2 — Find critical values: Solve the related equation (factorise, or use the quadratic formula if it doesn't factorise).
Step 3 — Sketch: A simple U-shaped sketch crossing the -axis at your two critical values (correctly ordered left-to-right) is non-negotiable — it is the only reliable way to avoid Step 4's main pitfall.
Step 4 — Interpret: Read the solution directly off the sketch.
- (above axis) → the two outer "arms" → "OR": or
- (below axis) → the single "trough" between roots → "AND":
03 — Explanation
What's the single biggest notation error to avoid?
Writing for an "OR" solution. This is mathematically impossible — no number is both less than and greater than . The word "or" is not optional; it's the only correct way to describe a disjoint region: or .
Exam Tip
Strict inequalities () use open circles on a number line; non-strict () use closed/filled circles.
04 — Explanation
What if the equation doesn't factorise?
Use the quadratic formula for the critical values, same method otherwise.
Worked example: Find the integer values satisfying .
Divide by 2: . Formula gives or .
Sketch: U-shape between these roots, solving "" (below axis) → .
The only integers in this range are 2 and 3.
05 — Explanation
What about special cases — repeated or no real roots?
If the discriminant , there's one repeated root where the vertex just touches the axis; if it's negative, the curve never crosses the axis at all. Either way, sketch first — the answer is often "all real numbers" or "no solution," decided entirely by whether the (U-shaped) graph ever dips below zero.
Example: — discriminant , so the graph never crosses the axis and stays entirely above it (its minimum is at ). Solution: all real numbers.
06 — Explanation
How do contextual (geometry) problems add an extra layer?
Solve the algebra first, then intersect with any physical constraints (e.g. side lengths must be positive).
Worked example: A rectangle has sides and cm, area . Find the range of .
Algebra: . Formula gives roots or , so .
Context: side .
Intersecting both conditions: .
07 — Worked example
Worked exam-style question
Solve and represent the solution on a number line.
Expand and set to standard form: . Factorise: , so critical values .
Sketch: U-shape crossing at and . We want "" (on or above axis) → the two outer arms.
On a number line: closed circles at and (non-strict), with arrows extending left from and right from .
Common Mistake
Treating as two separate inequalities ( and ) — the zero-product rule only applies when one side is zero. Always expand and rearrange to standard form first.